Comments for Victor Porton's Math Blog
https://portonmath.wordpress.com
Math research of Victor PortonSat, 26 May 2018 17:46:38 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/Comment on I proved that certain functors between topological spaces and endofuncoid are adjoint by porton
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2018/05/25/adjoint-functors/#comment-1932
Sat, 26 May 2018 17:46:38 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2854#comment-1932The theorem was erroneous. Now the draft contains a counterexample instead of the theorem.
]]>Comment on I proved that certain functors between topological spaces and endofuncoid are adjoint by porton
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2018/05/25/adjoint-functors/#comment-1931
Sat, 26 May 2018 17:29:38 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2854#comment-1931I’ve proposed a counterexample against the theorem (see the above link to my current draft).
]]>Comment on I proved that certain functors between topological spaces and endofuncoid are adjoint by porton
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2018/05/25/adjoint-functors/#comment-1930
Sat, 26 May 2018 17:12:19 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2854#comment-1930Well, one more error in the same proof 😦
]]>Comment on I proved that certain functors between topological spaces and endofuncoid are adjoint by porton
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2018/05/25/adjoint-functors/#comment-1929
Sat, 26 May 2018 16:45:38 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2854#comment-1929The error was corrected.
]]>Comment on I proved that certain functors between topological spaces and endofuncoid are adjoint by porton
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2018/05/25/adjoint-functors/#comment-1928
Sat, 26 May 2018 16:05:12 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2854#comment-1928I’ve found an error in my proof.
]]>Comment on Mappings between endofuncoids and topological spaces by porton
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2018/05/18/funcoids-and-topologies/#comment-1911
Mon, 21 May 2018 21:32:24 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2842#comment-1911The proof was with a fatal error. I have removed the said theorem from my drafts. Instead I’ve added a counterexample.
]]>Comment on New conjecture about funcoids by A counterexample to my recent conjecture | Victor Porton's Math Blog
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2018/05/20/conjecture-about-funcoids-2/#comment-1909
Sun, 20 May 2018 17:05:10 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2844#comment-1909[…] proposing this conjecture I quickly found a […]
]]>Comment on Offtopic: Formalized Gospel theology by porton
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2018/04/29/formalized-gospel/#comment-1886
Sun, 29 Apr 2018 19:55:43 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2830#comment-1886I corrected an error in this my post.
]]>Comment on A new partial result about products of filters [ERROR!] by porton
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2018/03/02/partial-result/#comment-1715
Sun, 04 Mar 2018 20:30:51 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2820#comment-1715The proof was with an error.
]]>Comment on Theory of filters is FINISHED! by porton
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2018/01/05/theory-of-filters-is-finished/#comment-1688
Sat, 06 Jan 2018 22:49:37 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2794#comment-1688Oh, it is not finished yet! I forgot to consider the idea of “generalized cofinite filters” (as currently described in http://www.mathematics21.org/binaries/addons.pdf)
]]>