Comments for Victor Porton's Math Blog
https://portonmath.wordpress.com
Math research of Victor PortonWed, 29 Mar 2017 22:36:45 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/Comment on A surprisingly easy proof of yesterday conjecture by porton
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2017/03/29/surprisingly-easy-proof/#comment-1408
Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:36:45 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2639#comment-1408Oops, my proof is erroneous. I hope to salvage the proof, however.
]]>Comment on Conjecture about funcoids by A surprisingly easy proof of yesterday conjecture | Victor Porton's Math Blog
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2017/03/27/conjecture-about-funcoids/#comment-1406
Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:05:19 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2636#comment-1406[…] have found a surprisingly easy proof of this conjecture which I proposed […]
]]>Comment on A new theorem proved by A base of a funcoid which is not a filter base | Victor Porton's Math Blog
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2017/03/25/a-new-theorem-proved-2/#comment-1403
Sun, 26 Mar 2017 20:55:47 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2627#comment-1403[…] converse of this theorem does not […]
]]>Comment on New conjecture about funcoids by I proved a conjecture | Victor Porton's Math Blog
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2017/01/03/new-conjecture-3/#comment-1374
Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:08:12 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2608#comment-1374[…] prayer in tongues and going down anointment of Holy Spirit I proved this conjecture about funcoids. The proof is currently located in this PDF file. Well, the proof is for special cases of […]
]]>Comment on A conjecture about funcoids proved by My proof was with an error | Victor Porton's Math Blog
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2016/12/25/conjecture-about-funcoids-proved/#comment-1356
Sun, 25 Dec 2016 16:45:17 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2600#comment-1356[…] claimed that I have proved the following […]
]]>Comment on A new diagram about funcoids and reloids by porton
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2016/11/26/new-diagram/#comment-1349
Sat, 26 Nov 2016 18:11:42 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2569#comment-1349The diagram was with an error. I have edited the post.
]]>Comment on Partial order and micronization (conjecture) by A conjecture proved | Victor Porton's Math Blog
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2016/10/28/partial-order-micronization/#comment-1340
Fri, 28 Oct 2016 19:28:40 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2542#comment-1340[…] I’ve found an easy positive proof of this my conjecture. […]
]]>Comment on An error in my math book corrected by porton
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2016/09/10/error-math-book-corrected/#comment-1327
Sat, 10 Sep 2016 17:10:17 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2517#comment-1327I’ve added to the post a note with my old definition.
]]>Comment on An error in my book by An error in my math book corrected | Victor Porton's Math Blog
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2016/09/10/error-in-my-book/#comment-1326
Sat, 10 Sep 2016 15:42:26 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=2514#comment-1326[…] noticing an error in my math book, I rewritten its section “Funcoids and filters” to reflect that […]
]]>Comment on Open problem: Pseudodifference of filters by I’ve solved a conjecture about pseudodifference of filters | Victor Porton's Math Blog
https://portonmath.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/filters-pseudodifference/#comment-1323
Sat, 03 Sep 2016 21:58:31 +0000http://portonmath.wordpress.com/?p=237#comment-1323[…] I claimed earlier that I partially solved this open problem. […]
]]>